So, basically, you make software that doesn’t work outside flatpak without patches, then start removed about how much those patches suck, then, instead of pretty much saying “we only support flapaks, stop bothering us with distro-related issues” on the issue page, you add even more stuff that needs to be patched out because “sesurity”? Makes perfect sense, ngl.

Actively resisting packaging is not the way, tho. You can just require an issue to be reproducible with flatpak, and otherwise tell ppl to bother the maintainer.

I suppose Microsoft doesn’t really care what ppl think or are comfortable with: it’s mostly OEMs that buy windows keys anyways, and they’ll continue doing so in the foreseeable future no matter how much windows sucks 🤷

As for w11 requirements, you also need a uefi, iirc. Here’s a random article on doing that: https://www.ctrl.blog/entry/how-to-win11-in-gnome-boxes.html

Yeah, whatever. If you don’t like the community, you leave it. Or make your own unofficial community with blackjack and hookers. As simple as that.