Preemptive prevention of access is a form of noncompliance
Preemptive prevention of access is a form of noncompliance
Why wait, message IT right now, this is a huge growth opportunity for the company!
I was answering
Name another company on the planet that will receive a legal warrant and refuses to comply. I’ll wait.
And the fact that their internal information even can reveal any information indicates a lack of true privacy. Here is an example of setting up a system so you cannot comply.
Testing 1 2 3
Yes we call it “the legal system”
Yes if you say in a social setting you are going to kill the president, or if you called in a bomb threat to an airline, these are social nonos that can get you on the no fly list.
You’re assuming they have no other debt, as medical debt doesn’t influence your credit and you can’t be forced to pay it unlike other forms of debt, making it the last form of debt to pay off (and most have some larger crippling debt that comes first). You’re assuming they’re paid more than minimum wage (~15k a year), so 1/15 of their yearly income, and that already cannot afford housing and food. You’re assuming they have a consistent income and aren’t seasonal only.
Social misdeeds also remove you from being able to fly in the US, maybe I’m missing something…
So it’s a social media, made by China, making it Chinese social media. If you want to argue that its not the social media used by the Chinese, that’s different and should be phrased more clearly.
Their internal polling indicated 100% of people drink pen ink ¯\(ツ)/¯
Not having logs helps a ton with anonymity, and your question didn’t have that requirement.